Active Light Tutorial

[angel ('',)]

I found this awesome tutorial
about active light

hope u interest

http://www.psdextras.com/tutorials/85-active-light.html

[Leo Lichtman]

Post by angel ('',)
about active light

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yeah, right! They took an excellent image and screwed it up.

[angel ('',)]

Post by Leo Lichtman

Post by angel ('',)
about active light

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yeah, right!  They took an excellent image and screwed it up.

Dear Leo

it's clear from ur reply that u don't understand anything about active
light or how does it work and for that i recommand u to take lessons
in photoshop first before u come here and bla about a thing that's
perfectly done
and i would like to see u participate with something useful instead of
ur sarcastic comments

thanks
p.s i also know a perfect place for photoshop lessons hope u'll be
intersted
www.psdextras.com
it really helped me

[Leo Lichtman]

"angel ('',)" wrote: it's clear from ur reply that u don't understand
anything about active
light or how does it work and for that i recommand u to take lessons
in photoshop first before u come here and bla about a thing that's
perfectly done
and i would like to see u participate with something useful instead of
ur sarcastic comments\
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is it possible that I could be wrong? Let's hear from someone besides the
OP and me.

For an example of my contributing something useful, please note the thread
on printing multiple images, started by Dan Wentz.

[angel ('',)]

"angel ('',)" wrote:  it's clear from ur reply that u don't understand
anything about active
light or how does it work and for that i recommand u to take lessons
in photoshop first before u come here and bla about a thing that's
perfectly done
and i would like to see u participate with something useful instead of
ur sarcastic comments\
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is it possible that I could be wrong?  Let's hear from someone besides the
OP and me.
For an example of my contributing something useful, please note the thread
on printing multiple images, started by Dan Wentz.

i have seen the thread on printing multiple images and u were pretty
useful but it has nothing to do with my post and still u didn't proove
ur point .
and u haven't explained ur objection on my link instead u choosed to
be sarcastic and careless about something i care about and love .
at least i decided to share something usefull in this area to help
people as it helped me .....WHAT U HAVE DECIDED TO DO ?????!!!!!!!!!!

[Leo Lichtman]

"angel ('' wrote:
WHAT U HAVE DECIDED TO DO ?????!!!!!!!!!!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I have decided not to argue with you--it is pointless.

[Worn Out Retread]

Post by Leo Lichtman
"angel ('',)" wrote: it's clear from ur reply that u don't understand
anything about active
light or how does it work and for that i recommand u to take lessons
in photoshop first before u come here and bla about a thing that's
perfectly done
and i would like to see u participate with something useful instead of
ur sarcastic comments\
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is it possible that I could be wrong? Let's hear from someone besides the
OP and me.
For an example of my contributing something useful, please note the thread
on printing multiple images, started by Dan Wentz.

I agree with you that all they managed to show was how to screw up a
perfectly good image using Photo Shop. You can screw up the image in the
same way using other graphics programs. It is the result that counts and not
the program that produced it.

If this was supposed to be an "artistic" effect, they in my opinion failed
miserably.

[angel ('',)]

Post by Worn Out Retread

"angel ('',)" wrote:  it's clear from ur reply that u don't understand
anything about active
light or how does it work and for that i recommand u to take lessons
in photoshop first before u come here and bla about a thing that's
perfectly done
and i would like to see u participate with something useful instead of
ur sarcastic comments\
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is it possible that I could be wrong?  Let's hear from someone besides the
OP and me.
For an example of my contributing something useful, please note the thread
on printing multiple images, started by Dan Wentz.

I agree with you that all they managed to show was how to screw up a
perfectly good image using Photo Shop. You can screw up the image in the
same way using other graphics programs. It is the result that counts and not
the program that produced it.
If this was supposed to be an "artistic" effect, they in my opinion failed
miserably.

***********************************************************

i respect ur point of view .

but from the way i see it. the image is perfectly done and the effect
of the active light is shown practically in a good way

and talking about artistic effects i study arts and there is nothing
wrong in the image

could u please show me an example of active light tutorial that u
consider perfectly done ?

thanks